Stable Algebraic Topology and Stable Topological Algebra
نویسنده
چکیده
Algebraic topology is a young subject, and its foundations are not yet firmly in place. I shall give some history, examples, and modern developments in that part of the subject called stable algebraic topology, or stable homotopy theory. This is by far the most calculationally accessible part of algebraic topology, although it is also the least intuitively grounded in visualizable geometric objects. It has a great many applications to such other subjects as algebraic geometry and geometric topology. Time will not allow me to say as much as I would like about that. Rather I will emphasize some foundational issues that have been central to this part of algebraic topology since the early 1960’s, but that have only been satisfactorily resolved in the last few years. It was only in 1952, with Eilenberg and Steenrod’s book “Foundations of algebraic topology” [9], that the nature of ordinary homology and cohomology theories was reasonably well understood. Even then, the modern way of thinking about cohomology as represented by Eilenberg-Mac Lane spaces was nowhere mentioned. It may have been known by then, but it certainly was not known to be important. The subject changed drastically with a series of extraordinary advances in the 1950’s and early 1960’s. By around 1960, it had become apparent that algebraic topology divides naturally into two rather different major branches: unstable homotopy theory and stable homotopy theory. The former concerns space level invariants, such as the fundamental group, that are more or less invisible to homology and cohomology theories. The latter concerns invariants that are in a sense independent of dimension. More precisely, it concerns invariants that are stable under suspension, such as homology and cohomology groups. It had also became apparent that many interesting phenomena that a priori seemed to depend on a dimension could be translated into questions in stable algebraic topology. Three fundamental examples have set the tone for a great deal of modern algebraic topology. They occurred nearly simultaneously in the late 1950’s and early 1960’s. The order I will give is not chronological. First, Adams [1] proved that the only possible dimensions of a normed linear algebra over R are 1, 2, 4, or 8 by translating the problem into one in stable homotopy theory. More precisely, the problem translated into a problem in ordinary mod 2 cohomology theory that involved only the Steenrod cohomology operations Sq : H(X;Z2) −→ H(X;Z2) and not the cup product. The Steenrod operations are stable, in the sense that ΣSq = SqΣ
منابع مشابه
Categorically-algebraic topology and its applications
This paper introduces a new approach to topology, based on category theory and universal algebra, and called categorically-algebraic (catalg) topology. It incorporates the most important settings of lattice-valued topology, including poslat topology of S.~E.~Rodabaugh, $(L,M)$-fuzzy topology of T.~Kubiak and A.~v{S}ostak, and $M$-fuzzy topology on $L$-fuzzy sets of C.~Guido. Moreover, its respe...
متن کاملFunctorial semantics of topological theories
Following the categorical approach to universal algebra through algebraic theories, proposed by F.~W.~Lawvere in his PhD thesis, this paper aims at introducing a similar setting for general topology. The cornerstone of the new framework is the notion of emph{categorically-algebraic} (emph{catalg}) emph{topological theory}, whose models induce a category of topological structures. We introduce t...
متن کاملON ALGEBRAIC AND COALGEBRAIC CATEGORIES OF VARIETY-BASED TOPOLOGICAL SYSTEMS
Motivated by the recent study on categorical properties of latticevalued topology, the paper considers a generalization of the notion of topological system introduced by S. Vickers, providing an algebraic and a coalgebraic category of the new structures. As a result, the nature of the category TopSys of S. Vickers gets clari ed, and a metatheorem is stated, claiming that (latticevalu...
متن کاملTriangulated categories without models
We exhibit examples of triangulated categories which are neither the stable category of a Frobenius category nor a full triangulated subcategory of the homotopy category of a stable model category. Even more drastically, our examples do not admit any non-trivial exact functors to or from these algebraic respectively topological triangulated categories. Introduction. Triangulated categories are ...
متن کاملAlgebraic and topological aspects of quasi-prime ideals
In this paper, we define the new notion of quasi-prime ideal which generalizes at once both prime ideal and primary ideal notions. Then a natural topology on the set of quasi-prime ideals of a ring is introduced which admits the Zariski topology as a subspace topology. The basic properties of the quasi-prime spectrum are studied and several interesting results are obtained. Specially, it is pro...
متن کاملDeformation Bicomplex of Module-algebras
Let H be a bialgebra. An H-module-algebra is an associative algebra A that is also an H-module such that the multiplication map on A becomes an H-module morphism. This algebraic structure arises often in algebraic topology, quantum groups [11, Chapter V.6], Lie and Hopf algebras theory [3, 16, 19], and group representations [1, Chapter 3]. For example, in algebraic topology, the complex cobordi...
متن کامل